引导语：下面小编给大家带来专四作文押题汇总，希望能够帮助到您，谢谢您的阅读，祝您阅读愉快。

　　押题一：对裸婚的接受程度

　　题目要求：

　　The following chart shows the different attitudes of men and women towards down-to-earth marriage. Look at the chart carefully and write your response in about 200 words, in which you should interpret the chart, state the reasons and give your comments.

　　Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.

　　审题思路：

　　本题属于图表作文。从柱状图可以了解到男女两性对裸婚的不同态度。行文时首先简单描述图表内容，然后从男女对婚姻的要求及现实社会生活两方面具体分析男女不同的观点及成因，最后总结自己观点。

　　高分范文：

　　The Acceptance of Down-to-earth Marriage

　　The chart above clearly demonstrates the different attitudes towards down-to-earth marriage between men and women.

　　We can see clearly from the chart that the percentage of male respondents supporting the idea of down-to-earth marriage is much higher than that of female ones. There is no doubt that this reflects the difference between man and woman. For one thing, it lies in their different demands for marriage. The majority of women focus on the sense of security. After all, marriage is not equal to love, and the basic material foundation is necessary, especially after married. Meanwhile, they take material foundation as the reflection of man’s responsibility. For another, to some extent, it is the consequence of the actual social reality, such as the high living standard, high wedding cost and more free and independent minds. Taking into account what has been discussed above, we can arrive at the conclusion that the findings that men and women have distinct attitudes towards down-to-earth marriage are consistent with the differences between the two genders as well as with the development of society.

　　I believe that the percentage of people supporting the so-called down-to-earth marriage will change constantly as time goes on.

　　押题二：应减少明星真人秀吗?

　　题目要求：

　　With the popularity of reality shows, more and more stars or celebrities are seen on various TV entertainment programs. Some people strongly advise to reduce star reality shows, for the fear that the universal entertainment will exert bad influence on our behavior. What is your idea of star reality shows?

　　Write a composition of about 200 words on the following topic:

　　Should Star Reality Shows Be Decreased?

　　Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.

　　审题思路：

　　本题是一个观点论证型题目，核心问题是如何看待明星真人秀。有两个基本观点：明星真人秀是成功的商业运作，无论对经济还是观众都是有益的;应该减少明星真人秀，因其会使我们进入全民娱乐时代，不利于提升国民素质。可根据以下思路展开写作：

　　思路1：不应该减少明星真人秀。

　　首先，很多节目会促使观众关注之前忽略或不够重视的东西，比如亲子教育、节俭生活、体育精神等。其次，明星的“名人效应”会提高一些偏远地区的曝光率，推动当地旅游业以及经济发展。

　　思路2：应该减少明星真人秀。

　　太多的明星真人秀会造成全民娱乐，不利于国民素质的提升。很多节目专注于“秀”，通过曝光明星隐私、故意增加明星之间的冲突等来夺人眼球，节目不仅毫无质量而且对观众易造成负面影响。另外，从成本上来说，明星真人秀成本太大，而有时收效却甚微，不如将这些资源投入到更具教育性、更有意义的节目中。

　　范文选择思路1。分别以“爸爸去哪儿”和“奔跑吧，兄弟”为例，分析明星真人秀给观众和经济增长带来的益处。最后指出，根据优胜劣汰的规律，不必刻意减少明星真人秀的数量，因为不好的节目自然会被淘汰。

　　本题讨论是否应该只奖励优等生。在具体行文方面，考生首先要总结材料，简要概述正反双方的观点。然后给出自己的观点：不应该只奖励优等生，还应奖励学习进步的学生。最后总结全文。

　　高分范文：

　　Should Star Reality Shows Be Decreased?

　　Since stars or celebrities often have great charisma to attract and affect ordinary people, those reality shows they attend can arouse our reflection and discussion on some issues we may have ignored before.

　　Let’s take the example of a well-known star reality show “Dad, Where Are We Going?” Not only does the program trigger our precious memory about care and love from fathers, but different ways of interaction between star fathers and their children bring about a fierce discussion about the family education and let us rethink the way we get along with our families.

　　In addition, star reality shows, to some extent, have been used recently as an important way to introduce China’s regions and to promote tourism of the place where they have been filmed. When “Chinese Running Man”, a reality TV show that gets popular Chinese stars to complete different tasks outdoors, filmed a segment in Dunhuang, Gansu province, it brought a lot of good publicity to the area. After the show was broadcast, there were hundreds of news reports on Gansu and thus it attracted thousands of tourists throughout the country.

　　It is unnecessary to fix our eyes on tiny shortcomings of some star reality shows because, on the one hand, programs demonstrating what the society wants and needs will definitely retain and if not, they will finally vanish from sight; on the other hand, many star reality shows benefit the audience and the economic growth.

　　押题三：是否应该只奖励优等生?

　　题目要求：

　　Should we only reward the best students? This has been intensely discussed for years. The following are the supporters’ and opponents’ opinions. Read carefully the opinions from both sides and write your response in about 200 words, in which you should first summarize briefly the opinions from both sides and give your views on the issue.

　　Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.

　　YES

　　It is reasonable to offer prizes to the high-level performers. This is because one needs to pay a greater amount of effort than others in order to earn a higher grade in the exams.

　　Top performers normally act as a facilitator to encourage other students to work harder and they can create a competitive learning environment at the school. Rendering those elite students rewards like scholarships or honors has been justified as a feasible way to inspire students.

　　Academic study is also a kind of competition, which should abide by the rule of fairness and reward the best performers.

　　NO

　　Those best students are relatively few in a class. If we only pay attention to those high-level learners and ignore the rest of the students, their enthusiasm for study, to a large degree, might be reduced.

　　It is necessary for teachers to give certain awards to those who put considerable efforts in the study. The extrinsic reward provided to them is a motivator for further study since a sense of accomplishment can boost their confidence and help them get great improvements in later study.

　　Those who have made improvements in their study should be rewarded because it is a kind of recognition of their efforts and industry.

　　审题思路:

　　本题讨论是否应该只奖励优等生。在具体行文方面，考生首先要总结材料，简要概述正反双方的观点。然后给出自己的观点：不应该只奖励优等生，还应奖励学习进步的学生。最后总结全文。

　　高分范文：

　　Should We Only Reward the Best Students?

　　Rewarding top students is normally considered as an effective approach to recognize their achievements and inspire other students. But some people argue that although the best students deserve to be rewarded, it is more important to encourage those who show remarkable improvement since they have paid unremitting effort in their study.

　　My stand is that prizes should also be awarded to students who make conspicuous progress in their academic study. Firstly, education is based on the belief that it will make people more excellent, and encouraging those most improved students will be one of the best ways to fulfill that goal. Moreover, students differ greatly in their talents and living environment. Students from poverty-stricken families may not prevail over the best ones in study, but that doesn’t mean they can’t succeed in their future career. Therefore, spiritual or economic encouragement is likely to stimulate them to tackle seemingly impossible tasks. In addition, to reward the most improved students can not only boost their confidence but also enhance students’ competitive spirit.

　　In sum, only rendering outstanding students rewards may dampen the others’ enthusiasm, so to encourage both types of students will be a feasible way to establish aspiring learning atmosphere.

　　押题四：是否应该让年轻人担任政府要职?

　　题目要求：

　　Should young people undertake important positions in the government? This issue has been intensely discussed for years. The following are the supporters’ and opponents’ opinions. Read carefully the opinions from both sides and write your response in about 200 words, in which you should first summarize briefly the opinions from both sides and give your views on the issue.

　　Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.

　　YES

　　Young leaders who have been well educated are more likely to have a deeper understanding of cultural difference, and they can empathize with other employees and clients much better. Today, empathy plays a key role in retention of talents.

　　Compared with the senior leaders, young directors can apply the latest technology and theory into practice, and this can counteract negative stereotype of management and greatly improve productivity.

　　A distinct merit emerging from youngsters working on such positions is the improvement of government efficiency. Admittedly, a majority of governmental agencies are thirsty for high-efficiency operation so that they can provide better services for the public.

　　NO

　　Youngsters might make incorrect decisions that hamper government work due to their lack of work experience and analyzing capabilities when facing significant problems.

　　Elderly people have better cognitive skills, such as big-picture thinking and long-term vision. It is because years of work experience and failures teach them to take every aspect into consideration before making important decisions.

　　Since the senior leaders have already overcome countless difficulties and challenges prior, they can quickly adjust their mood in turmoil and lift the morale of the whole organization.

　　审题思路:

　　本题讨论是否应该让年轻人担任政府要职。在具体行文方面，考生首先要总结概述正反方的观点。然后给出自己的观点：尽管年长的领导者更有威信和影响力，但还是应该让更多的年轻人担任政府要职。最后总结全文，重申观点。

　　高分范文：

　　Should Young People Undertake Important Positions in the Government?

　　Nowadays, whether young people should hold important posts in the government has become a controversial issue. Many citizens tend to distrust young leaders’ working abilities due to their age and inexperience. However, some people believe that youngsters are eligible for leadership roles because of their innovation and vitality.

　　From my point of view, I’m inclined to elect young people as leaders although older leaders have more credibility and influence. To begin with, young leaders can take more decisive measures to tackle corruption and neglect of duty since they have less interpersonal problems to worry about. Moreover, with youngsters undertaking senior positions, efficiency in handling affairs will be highly improved so as to keep the government innovative and productive. Finally, young leaders are more open-minded and easier to take in new things, which can facilitate the enforcement of new policies.

　　To sum up, old leaders have to be continually replaced by new ones, which is an unalterable law of nature, so young people should be given opportunities to exercise leadership. And yet there is no denying that young leaders have a lot to learn from the old, since the senior leaders have rich work experience and long-term vision.

　　押题五：环境问题是否靠个人的努力无法解决?

　　题目要求：

　　Are the environmental problems too big for individuals to solve? This matter has been intensely discussed for years. The following are the supporters’ and opponents’ opinions. Read carefully the opinions from both sides and write your response in about 200 words, in which you should first summarize briefly the opinions from both sides and give your views on the issue.

　　Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.

　　YES

　　No matter how small personal involvement in environmental conservation might be, it is an unshakable obligation for everyone to safeguard the environment.

　　It is known that environment contamination and conservation are long-term problems, and no single government or big company can meet this challenge alone. As such, whoever created the environment problem should be responsible for solving it; environment protection needs every one of us to continuously participate in.

　　The public’s wills and behaviors have an important influence on government’s policies and companies’ strategies. For example, if everyone says “No” to plastic shopping bags and paper cups, then the companies that manufacture such products will switch to environmental-friendly substitutes in order to survive in the market.

　　In some cases, the lighter sentences might also lead to people’s resentment towards the judicial system as victims might argue that these young offenders do not confess what they have done. This could also result in insecurity in our society eventually.

　　NO

　　Some severe environmental pollution, such as global warming or sea contamination, might fail to be resolved only by personal effort. In this case, the government plays a challenging but inescapable role in environmental management because the government is the only legalized institution that may formulate legislation related to environmental problems.

　　The government can enact laws and introduce programs to raise public awareness of low-carbon.

　　Big companies have outstanding advantages in finance and technology, which give them the possibility to reduce pollution. For instance, some big companies can improve their production process to recycle the waste.

　　审题思路:

　　本题讨论环境问题是否靠个人的努力无法解决。在具体行文方面，考生首先要总结概述正反方的观点。然后给出自己的观点：环境问题的解决需要个人和政府共同付出努力，两者相辅相成，缺一不可。最后总结全文。

　　高分范文：

　　Are the Environmental Problems Too Big for Individuals to Solve?

　　Since our earth is faced with the unprecedented environmental challenge, environmental protection has become an urgent issue for governments and ordinary people. Some people are of the opinion that no effort is too small in terms of environmental protection because it needs everyone’s help and participation to optimize the living surroundings. However, there are different voices insisting that only governments and large companies can make a difference in solving the problem.

　　Personally I hold the perspective that the joint efforts of both governments and individuals are indispensable in settling environmental concerns fundamentally and neither can work effectively without the other. For one thing, governments’ regulations and supervision can make full use of the considerable manpower and material resources consistently devoted to tackling environmental contamination. For another, without the participation of common people, every green policy enacted by the authorities will end in failure because it is human activities that have the greatest influence on the environment through all recorded history.

　　All in all, individual support plays an important role in implementing governmental policies on environmental improvement and resisting the acts of destroying environment. In the meantime, the government should also shoulder its responsibility to make its people live in a safer and healthier environment.