政府解决交通挤塞的最佳方法是提供免费公共交通工具，每天24小时，每周7天。你同意还是不同意?下面是小编整理的雅思英语作文，大家可以参考参考。

　　题目：The best way for the government to solve traffic congestion is to provide free public transport 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. Do you agree or disagree?

　　雅思作文范文1：

　　When it comes to the issue about how to tackle traffic congestions, some people may argue that the best solution is to offer citizens free public transport all the time, but personally speaking, I cannot approve of this opinion.

　　Admittedly, free transportation could function to reduce traffic congestions because people would decrease the use of private cars. With the purpose of saving money, more passengers prefer to choose public transport rather than drive their own cars. Then, even during the commuting time, the number of private cars may drop significantly, and there will be less traffic congestion. Nevertheless, there exist more drawbacks than benefits acquired from free transportation.

　　To begin with, the government may face more economic burdens if public transportation is free. The government has the responsibility of optimizing resources it has to improve the life quality of its citizens. Providing that the government allocates too much money to public traffic, other parts of services, such as pension for the elderly and the disabled, may not be well supported. Thus, in order to balance the use of funding of the government, public transport should not be free.

　　Furthermore, providing free public transport all the time could lead to a waste of resources. It is commonly acknowledged that traffic congestions usually occur during the commuting time and it may be a more efficient method to provide zero-fare transport in some specific periods, such as between 7 am to 8 am in the morning. Apart from the commuting time, free public transport does not make sense because there is no congestion at all.

　　In sum, providing free public transport all the time may not be the best method to tackle traffic congestions, considering that there is no need to provide free transport when there is no congestion and the government may face financial deficit as well.

　　雅思作文范文2：

　　Most of us must have experienced the anger, frustration and even despair when we got stuck in the long unmovable procession of vehicles. Actually, the government has tried numerous ways to bring down the traffic, but mostly in vain. Recently, it is proposed that 24/7 free public transport be provided to solve the traffic congestion. While I think this proposal may be helpful, it is far from the best solution.

　　Undoubtedly, with the introduction of free public transport, some people may choose to drive less of their own cars, and this will be helpful to ease the traffic, though I doubt the extent to which this can help the traffic. When public transport goes free, many people who otherwise would stay at home may choose to go out by taking the free transport. This will greatly offset the benefits brought by the reduced number of private cars on road and may even paralyze the public transport system, especially during the rush hours. Beijing, for instance, found itself in great traffic trouble when the city announced to provide free metro service for its citizens during the Asian Games in 1990. Then in 2008 when Beijing was hosting the Olympic Games, the city never made the similar attempt.

　　Therefore, to combat the traffic problem, providing free public transport alone is not enough. Instead, we should assemble efforts from various sides such the government, the drivers as well as the pedestrians. On the part of the government, rather than providing funds for the free public transport, it should make more investments on the construction of roads, and introduce stricter traffic laws, rules and regulations. And, if the drivers and pedestrians were more careful in abiding by the traffic rules, the traffic problem could also be effectively alleviated.

　　雅思作文范文3：

　　An effective way for the government to ease traffic congestion is to encourage the public to take more public transport, but I do question the feasibility of offering it free 24 hours a day and 7 days a week.

　　Theoretically, providing 24 / 7 free public transport could produce some desirable outcomes. More people would choose to take the subway or the bus and there might be less dependence on private vehicles. Also, it could make it especially easier to those financially disadvantaged people. However, the validity of the policy need to be challenged.

　　Most countries are operating public transport system as a public service with governmental subsidy, and therefore free public transport would be financially impossible. Besides, the efficiency of the system could suffer in early mornings and at late nights for very few people would actually use public transport, which is a great waste of public funds.

　　To solve traffic gridlock, reasonable support for the public transport system is needed. But instead of making it 24 / 7 free of charge, the availability of convenient and reliable transport options could be promoted and people need to be able to afford them. In addition,certain restrictions should be put on unnecessary car use,for instance short journeys within already congested areas.More importantly, the government need to implement reasonable city road plan, because a big proportion of traffic jams are caused by inappropriate road construction.

　　To conclude 24 / 7 free public transport is far from a valid solution to resolve traffic congestion in the long run, thus other alternative strategies need to be considered.